Configuration#
Let’s look at how we can configure DataFusion. When creating a SessionContext, you can pass in
a SessionConfig and RuntimeEnvBuilder object. These two cover a wide range of options.
from datafusion import RuntimeEnvBuilder, SessionConfig, SessionContext
# create a session context with default settings
ctx = SessionContext()
print(ctx)
# create a session context with explicit runtime and config settings
runtime = RuntimeEnvBuilder().with_disk_manager_os().with_fair_spill_pool(10000000)
config = (
SessionConfig()
.with_create_default_catalog_and_schema(True)
.with_default_catalog_and_schema("foo", "bar")
.with_target_partitions(8)
.with_information_schema(True)
.with_repartition_joins(False)
.with_repartition_aggregations(False)
.with_repartition_windows(False)
.with_parquet_pruning(False)
.set("datafusion.execution.parquet.pushdown_filters", "true")
)
ctx = SessionContext(config, runtime)
print(ctx)
Setting options by key#
The with_* methods cover the common options, but any option DataFusion declares can be
set by its fully qualified key with set(). The value is
always a string, and is parsed according to the type the option declares, so an unknown key
or an unparsable value raises rather than being silently ignored:
config = SessionConfig().set("datafusion.execution.batch_size", "1024")
A whole dictionary of options can be applied at once by passing it to the
SessionConfig constructor, which is the shape a replayed set of
settings usually arrives in:
config = SessionConfig({"datafusion.execution.batch_size": "1024"})
Both routes reject the same keys, so which one you use does not change what is accepted. The constructor applies its entries in an unspecified order, so a dictionary with more than one bad key does not report a predictable one first.
One trap is worth knowing about if you read settings back out of a session and replay them
somewhere else, such as onto a worker process or into a test fixture. With
with_information_schema(True), the information_schema.df_settings table lists the
datafusion.runtime.* keys alongside the rest, but those come from the runtime environment
rather than from ConfigOptions and cannot be set this way. Feeding that table’s rows back
in verbatim will fail on the first such row, whichever route you use. Configure the runtime
through RuntimeEnvBuilder instead, and skip the datafusion.runtime. prefix when
replaying.
Maximizing CPU Usage#
DataFusion uses partitions to parallelize work. For small queries the default configuration (number of CPU cores) is often sufficient, but to fully utilize available hardware you can tune how many partitions are created and when DataFusion will repartition data automatically.
Configure a SessionContext with a higher partition count:
from datafusion import SessionConfig, SessionContext
# allow up to 16 concurrent partitions
config = SessionConfig().with_target_partitions(16)
ctx = SessionContext(config)
Automatic repartitioning for joins, aggregations, window functions and other operations can be enabled to increase parallelism:
config = (
SessionConfig()
.with_target_partitions(16)
.with_repartition_joins(True)
.with_repartition_aggregations(True)
.with_repartition_windows(True)
)
Manual repartitioning is available on DataFrames when you need precise control:
from datafusion import col
df = ctx.read_parquet("data.parquet")
# Evenly divide into 16 partitions
df = df.repartition(16)
# Or partition by the hash of a column
df = df.repartition_by_hash(col("a"), num=16)
result = df.collect()
Checking what the plan actually does#
repartition and repartition_by_hash are requests, not instructions. The optimizer is
free to drop a repartition nothing downstream needs, to collapse partitions again for an
operator that requires a single stream, or to substitute a repartition of its own sized by
target_partitions. So the number you passed is not necessarily the number you get.
output_partitioning reports what the built plan does,
as opposed to what was asked of it:
from datafusion import SessionConfig, SessionContext, col, functions as f
config = SessionConfig().with_target_partitions(16)
ctx = SessionContext(config)
df = ctx.read_parquet("data.parquet").repartition_by_hash(col("a"), num=8)
plan = df.aggregate([col("a")], [f.sum(col("b"))]).execution_plan()
partitioning = plan.output_partitioning
print(partitioning.scheme) # 'Hash'
print(partitioning.partition_count) # 16 -- target_partitions, not the 8 requested
print(partitioning.hash_expressions) # ['a@0']
The request for eight partitions did not survive: the optimizer inserted its own hash
repartition at target_partitions instead. Had the aggregation been left off, the
repartition would have been removed altogether and the plan would report
UnknownPartitioning over the source’s own partition count.
UnknownPartitioning means the plan knows how many partitions it has but nothing about how
rows are distributed across them, which is the ordinary case for a file scan.
partition_count gives the same count on its own when
the scheme does not matter.
Four schemes exist, but only three of them can come out of a plan you built here.
UnknownPartitioning comes from a source, and RoundRobinBatch and Hash from a
repartition — either one you asked for or one the optimizer inserted. Range, which spreads
an ordered key space across partitions at chosen split points, has no request form in this
package: repartition asks for round-robin, repartition_by_hash asks for hash, and SQL
has no range-repartition syntax.
It is still worth handling, because a plan does not have to have been built here. Both
datafusion-proto and datafusion-ffi carry range partitioning faithfully, so
from_bytes() can return a plan reporting it, as can an
extension library whose query planner builds one — see Query planners. Such a
plan executes normally; only the split points are invisible, since
hash_expressions returns None for every scheme
but Hash. Read repr() of the partitioning to see them.
Benchmark Example#
The repository includes a benchmark script that demonstrates how to maximize CPU usage
with DataFusion. The benchmarks/max_cpu_usage.py script shows a practical example
of configuring DataFusion for optimal parallelism.
You can run the benchmark script to see the impact of different configuration settings:
# Run with default settings (uses all CPU cores)
python benchmarks/max_cpu_usage.py
# Run with specific number of rows and partitions
python benchmarks/max_cpu_usage.py --rows 5000000 --partitions 16
# See all available options
python benchmarks/max_cpu_usage.py --help
Here’s an example showing the performance difference between single and multiple partitions:
# Single partition - slower processing
$ python benchmarks/max_cpu_usage.py --rows=10000000 --partitions 1
Processed 10000000 rows using 1 partitions in 0.107s
# Multiple partitions - faster processing
$ python benchmarks/max_cpu_usage.py --rows=10000000 --partitions 10
Processed 10000000 rows using 10 partitions in 0.038s
This example demonstrates nearly 3x performance improvement (0.107s vs 0.038s) when using 10 partitions instead of 1, showcasing how proper partitioning can significantly improve CPU utilization and query performance.
The script demonstrates several key optimization techniques:
Higher target partition count: Uses
with_target_partitions()to set the number of concurrent partitionsAutomatic repartitioning: Enables repartitioning for joins, aggregations, and window functions
Manual repartitioning: Uses
repartition()to ensure all partitions are utilizedCPU-intensive operations: Performs aggregations that can benefit from parallelization
The benchmark creates synthetic data and measures the time taken to perform a sum aggregation across the specified number of partitions. This helps you understand how partition configuration affects performance on your specific hardware.
Important Considerations#
The provided benchmark script demonstrates partitioning concepts using synthetic in-memory data and simple aggregation operations. While useful for understanding basic configuration principles, actual performance in production environments may vary significantly based on numerous factors:
Data Sources and I/O Characteristics:
Table providers: Performance differs greatly between Parquet files, CSV files, databases, and cloud storage
Storage type: Local SSD, network-attached storage, and cloud storage have vastly different characteristics
Network latency: Remote data sources introduce additional latency considerations
File sizes and distribution: Large files may benefit differently from partitioning than many small files
Query and Workload Characteristics:
Operation complexity: Simple aggregations versus complex joins, window functions, or nested queries
Data distribution: Skewed data may not partition evenly, affecting parallel efficiency
Memory usage: Large datasets may require different memory management strategies
Concurrent workloads: Multiple queries running simultaneously affect resource allocation
Hardware and Environment Factors:
CPU architecture: Different processors have varying parallel processing capabilities
Available memory: Limited RAM may require different optimization strategies
System load: Other applications competing for resources affect DataFusion performance
Recommendations for Production Use:
To optimize DataFusion for your specific use case, it is strongly recommended to:
Create custom benchmarks using your actual data sources, formats, and query patterns
Test with representative data volumes that match your production workloads
Measure end-to-end performance including data loading, processing, and result handling
Evaluate different configuration combinations for your specific hardware and workload
Monitor resource utilization (CPU, memory, I/O) to identify bottlenecks in your environment
This approach will provide more accurate insights into how DataFusion configuration options will impact your particular applications and infrastructure.
For more information about available SessionConfig options, see the rust DataFusion Configuration guide,
and about RuntimeEnvBuilder options in the rust online API documentation.